2:20

Plays here · Open on youtube ↗

UnknownRetained posts and the independent recent feed were checked; public evidence proves Luma attribution, while the commercial relationship remains unverified.2:20 · spoken hook

“Have you ever watched an AI video and thought that looked amazing for the first three seconds?”

The opening line · 0:00 · move: question

Benchmarks Luma against the viewer’s alternatives in “Supercool AI vs Luma AI: Which AI Video Looks More Real?,” using visible outputs and workflow tradeoffs rather than raw model claims alone.

362views2likes↑10.1×vs their usual post · 36 views45creators ran this script

@CREATIVES SUMAN · 35.9K followers · 0 of 30 recent posts mention Luma Dream Machine · creator page →

Playbook · Win the model-choice search →
The script, step by step35 lines
The script35 lines · @CREATIVES SUMAN
  1. 0:00Have you ever watched an AI video and thought that looked amazing for the first three seconds?
  2. 0:04And then suddenly the hands changed, the face looked picot different, or the movement just felt weird.
  3. 0:10That's usually the moment people stopped believing the video.
32 more linesmembers read and copy every script on the site
0
Where this post sitsthe repetition is the proof
Runs the playbook
Win the model-choice search

Meet the viewer at an explicit tool decision, run the same continuity and control tests, and translate model features into a production tradeoff.

AI-video reviewers comparing Luma with Seedance, Veo, Kling, Runway, and the rest of the buyer's shortlist · 45 creators · 76 posts

Open the full playbook →

this post · other creators who ran it

Who made ittheir public relationship signal, and the receipt for it
@CREATIVES SUMANyoutube · 35.9K followers · median 36 views · n=60best post36210.1×views · for Luma Dream MachineUnknown Retained posts and the independent recent feed were checked; public evidence proves Luma attribution, while the commercial relationship remains unverified.Open creator →

Views and likes are public counts at capture time. The multiple compares this post with the creator’s own recent median, not a claim about what caused its reach. Read the methodology →