1HOOK · questionInflate the stakes0:00
Saying goodbye to the film industry? That might sound a little exaggerated, but after what
PAID5:48The anchor — the post this playbook is read from.
Open the post page →
Meet the viewer at an explicit tool decision, run the same continuity and control tests, and translate model features into a production tradeoff.
Who runs it AI-video reviewers comparing Luma with Seedance, Veo, Kling, Runway, and the rest of the buyer's shortlist
1Saying goodbye to the film industry? That might sound a little exaggerated, but after what
2To get started, I jump into Luma and create a new workspace. Right away, you're
3After creating a new board, I clicked on Create Video and select the Ray 3.2 model. This is where
4For this test, I decided to create an
5What's really interesting is that Ray 3.2 doesn't treat these images as
6This approach gives me much more control over the storytelling process and allows me to shape
7Now I click Create and Ray 3.2 begins processing.

PAID23×@Harriet Moseryoutube49.5K views
PAID2.4×@AI BORDERyoutube42K views
PAID3.8×@Joseph Martinyoutube8.9K views
5.3×@Skill Destinyyoutube7.9K views
7.1×@AI Unlockedyoutube7.8K viewsEarlier playbook analysis · not fully re-reviewed in the latest pass
This playbook belongs to a structure shared across brands. Its member videos count toward each structure’s total. Open a structure to compare the grouped playbooks.
Another thing that immediately caught my attention was character consistency throughout the narrative.
9Once processing is complete, the final video is ready.
10After testing ray 3.2, the biggest takeaway for me was that AI video finally feels controllable.
11If you'd like to try ray 3.2 yourself,