1:28

Plays here · Open on tiktok ↗

Unknown“Cluely” appears in the public source; commercial relationship unverified — https://www.tiktok.com/@shifra_khan/video/75375156114216747581:28 · on_screen hook

“Free Cluely clone accused of stealing”

The opening line · 0:00 · move: problem

Uses a free Cluely clone’s alleged license violation to contrast copyable features with distribution moat, grounding the argument in Cluely’s $20 pricing, live-support UI, $15M raise, and competing launch receipts.

7.5Kviews—likes↑1.9×vs their usual post · 4K views26creators ran this script

@shifrakhan · — followers · 1 of 30 recent posts mention Cluely · creator page →

The script, step by step19 lines
The script19 lines · @shifrakhan
  1. 0:00Someone built a free Cooley clone and now the open-source community is accusing them of copying
  2. 0:04code without giving credit. Everyone knows Cooley by now. It's the viral startup that lets you
  3. 0:08cheat on everything by feeding you real-time AI answers. A few weeks ago, they also raised $15
16 more linesmembers read and copy every script on the site
0
Where this post sitsthe repetition is the proof
Runs the playbook
Turn the cheating scandal into distribution for the bigger company

Open on expulsion, cheating, or “main character” controversy, then argue that the outrage itself created protection, demand, and a launch surface for Cluely's broader AI company.

Founder interviews and tech podcasts reframing backlash as proof that attention, demand, and product direction are compounding together · 26 creators · 26 posts

Open the full playbook →

this post · other creators who ran it

Who made ittheir public relationship signal, and the receipt for it
@shifrakhantiktok · — followers · median 4K views · n=50best post7.5K1.9×views · for CluelyUnknown “Cluely” appears in the public source; commercial relationship unverified — https://www.tiktok.com/@shifra_khan/video/7537515611421674758Open creator →

Views and likes are public counts at capture time. The multiple compares this post with the creator’s own recent median, not a claim about what caused its reach. Read the methodology →