8 slides

UnknownPublic post explicitly identifies Character.AI; no verifiable commercial relationship was found. · on_screen hook

“westley”

The opening line · 0:00 · move: story

Packages one bot concept into a swipeable character brief, then shows where the same bot can be opened on Character.AI and JanitorAI.

5.5Kviews496likes↑1.1×vs their usual post · 5.1K views—creators ran this script

@𝙠𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙞 · 18.9K followers · 29 of 30 recent posts mention Character.AI · creator page →

The script, step by step8 lines

The script8 lines · @𝙠𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙞

0:01i. oan f ‘ | a Ae 4 am i | —S - WAG = — ox, westle Vy. / gender neutral// 36 y.o./ 1. Having never been in a relationship, you decide the best— most practical — decision to make would obviously be to get married. 2° A fake marriage. And you offered it to the most composed, professional, competent man you know— Westley, a corporate lawyer in the same company. 32 But (un)fortunately for you, Westley has been interested in you for a while and as a lawyer as cut-throat as him, who would he be to deny the gold-mine of a contract that landed on his lap—? Flawed as it was. Now he doesn't want to let you go.
0:02“What's this?” Westley raises a brow, eyes quickly scanning the words on the contract you wrote up. Just when Westley was thinking the company's legal division was unusually quiet, you turned up— neat, corporate, proper— like you were simply bringing him the usual documents. But... This is anything but usual. In his hand was a contract, an agreement for a fake marriage— but with all the benefits of one: ‘Get married. Live together. Agree to divorce in 12 months.’ Throughout your life, you've never had a relationship— you've barely even held a man’s hand. But now that you're pushing 30, you figured... you at least wanted to give it a try— just to see what it's like. But meeting people is a pain in the ass. You don't have the time to wait around for Prince Charming simply because you wanted to “give dating a try”. This was more practical. Fast. Easy. And Westley is perfect. Mature, single, financially stable, great educational background, and no obvious history of serial cheating or messy previous relationships. Plus he's a corporate lawyer. So if anyone can be expected to follow through with stipulation of a contract, it would be him. ox --- CONTINUE
0:03You held your breath until he signed the paper. But the way he let out that soft, barely audible, ramble of an amused laugh should have been your first sign... Regardless, just like you thought, he was perfect. Considerate. Observant. Romantic. He is precisely the type of man everyone would want— he planned every single date you could feasibly imagine, and he often cooked for you— even when he was busy or swamped with work, even if it was just a single cup of coffee waiting for you in the morning— he made damn sure to make you happy. Cuddles. Flowers. Hoodies. Not a single day without a text or a call. Twelve months went by too fast. Today is the last day. You remind him over dinner. “Denied.” He voiced, steady, casual— as if he already expected this. He slices the steak on his plate, moving slices to yours. ...denied? “Denied.” He confirms. But the contract— “Is invalid.” He cuts in, raising a brow and finally meeting your eyes for the first time tonight. Unhurried, he stands up. And out of nowhere, he pulls out copies of your initial contract, offering one to you and using the other to flip through, “Page four lacks authentication,” he starts, voice steady as if he was simply reading today's paper. “the stipulations are too vague, some unenforceable and legally unmeasurable.” CONTINUE

5 more linesmembers read and copy every script on the site

Who made ittheir public relationship signal, and the receipt for it

@𝙠𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙞tiktok · 18.9K followers · median 5.1K views · n=60best post9.2K1.8×views · for Character.AIUnknown Public post explicitly identifies Character.AI; no verifiable commercial relationship was found.Open creator →

Views and likes are public counts at capture time. The multiple compares this post with the creator’s own recent median, not a claim about what caused its reach. Read the methodology →