PROGRAM0:23

programBio says `Oficial Partner Supercell ❤️`; a canonical code tutorial says `Use Code: Nice`, while the current gameplay keeps player name `Code: Nice` visible. Program standing and code support are public; neither proves a per-post cash fee. ·0:23 · on_screen hook

“BO BUFFIE ☠️”

The opening line · 0:00 · move: reveal

Labels the Bo buff once, then demonstrates it against bots and a Heist safe so the before-and-after value is legible without narration.

2.8Mviews97.4Klikes↑90.6×vs their usual post · 30.9K views5creators ran this script

@NiceShotBS · 506.8K followers · 30 of 30 recent posts mention Brawl Stars · creator page →

Playbook · Feature reveal → controlled test → visible payoff →

The script, step by step5 lines

The script5 lines · @NiceShotBS

0:00BO BUFFIE ☠️ · Code: Nice
0:04Bo uses the buffed attack against three bots
0:09Super mines surround the Heist safe

2 more linesmembers read and copy every script on the site

Where this post sitsthe repetition is the proof

Runs the playbook

Feature reveal → controlled test → visible payoff

Name or reveal one update feature, move straight into a controlled training-room or challenge test, then let the skin effect, reward or result close the claim without a long explanation.

NiceShotBS and DrieBananen · 5 creators · 28 posts

Claim to controlled receipt and boundary Problem, fix, proof

Open the full playbook →

program2.8M@NiceShotBS

program30.2M@NiceShotBS

program4.1M@NiceShotBS

program4.4M@DrieBananen

this post · other creators who ran it

Who made ittheir public relationship signal, and the receipt for it

@NiceShotBStiktok · 506.8K followers · median 30.9K views · n=60best post92.4M3K×views · for Brawl Starsprogram Bio says `Oficial Partner Supercell ❤️`; a canonical code tutorial says `Use Code: Nice`, while the current gameplay keeps player name `Code: Nice` visible. Program standing and code support are public; neither proves a per-post cash fee. ·Open creator →

Views and likes are public counts at capture time. The multiple compares this post with the creator’s own recent median, not a claim about what caused its reach. Read the methodology →