—followers—median recent views · n=0 posts3.7K best post · Duolingo · vs own median1apps in the library · 0 with a standing program4posts audited
2025-11audited posts / month2026-10
0 standing programs, 0 ambassador-level feeds and 0 disclosed paid relationships in this sample. Repeated posting describes dedication; it does not prove a fee.
DuolingoEducation · 4 posts auditedorganicpublic evidence
Recent feedNot scanned
3.7K2025-11-25
The competing Ling channel uses Duolingo’s missing courses as comparison evidence and routes viewers to Ling; no Duolingo commercial tie is claimed — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1_UrAalmK4 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktR8K3FO2tI and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MriiOL2qEfs and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpzkOxAALxA The post that identifies it →
How they open4 of 4 audited posts run Native story with late product insertion. The lines below are the openings of their most-viewed posts.
3.7K views
Duolingo · @Ling Learn Languages
“Did you search for Punjabi on Duolingo and come up empty?”
1.3K views
Duolingo · @Ling Learn Languages
“Did you search for Serbian on Duolingo and come up at me?”
1.3K views
Duolingo · @Ling Learn Languages
“Did you search for Croatian on Duolingo and come up empty?”
828 views
Duolingo · @Ling Learn Languages
“Did you search for Pashto on Duolingo and come up empty?”
Followers, medians and views as captured in the research release. A multiple compares the post to the creator’s own recent median. Relationship labels describe the public evidence, never the amount paid. Definitions in the methodology.