Creator Β· tiktok

@π˜π”π‹πˆπ€πŸŒͺ️

π‘©π’π’‚π’„π’Œ π‘©π’‚π’“π’ƒπ’Šπ’† πŸ–€πŸ’…πŸΌ GlowUp | Beauty | Style πŸ”—cooperation.huracan@gmail.com

51.1Kfollowers10.3Kmedian recent views Β· n=60 posts301.5K Β· 29.2Γ—best post Β· Wink Β· vs own median1apps in the library Β· 0 with a standing program1posts audited
2025-11audited posts / month2026-10
Who they post for1 apps Β· public relationship evidence

0 standing programs, 0 ambassador-level feeds and 0 disclosed paid relationships in this sample. Repeated posting describes dedication; it does not prove a fee.

WinkVideo editing Β· 1 posts audited
Unknownunverified relationship
Recent feed0 of 30 posts mention it
301.5K29.2Γ—2025-07-18
The caption says `I always use this when I want that HD glow β€” just takes a few taps in Wink` with `#winkapp #wink`, proving Wink attribution; the target object exposes `isAd: true`, but the bounded current-page check did not render a post-specific visible disclosure label, so the commercial relationship remains unknown β€” https://www.tiktok.com/@yu.huracan/video/7528500790361640214 The post that identifies it β†’
The script they keep usingcounted from 1 audited posts
How they open1 of 1 audited posts run Problem, fix, proof. The lines below are the openings of their most-viewed posts.
Audited posts1 in sample Β· ranked by views Β· hover a frame to scrub

Followers, medians and views as captured in the research release. A multiple compares the post to the creator’s own recent median. Relationship labels describe the public evidence, never the amount paid. Definitions in the methodology.