Gauth

Across 449 fully audited posts—442 TikToks and seven YouTube reviews—from 60 creators, the public sample shows a paid student-content machine with two layers. Large entertainment and student creators run homework panic, teacher conflict and academic-comeback skits; dedicated Gauth accounts repeat the same student pains at much higher frequency.

The creator system is explicit: Gauth's public program confirms price/contract approval and draft review, while its 2026 H|FC role advertises $20 per video-hour plus a monthly view bonus and requires new branded accounts. In the audited roster, 2 creator relationships have direct paid-post disclosures, 41 expose program evidence, three are organic, and 14 remain unknown rather than being rounded up to paid.

The creative mix is 17 result-first, 173 creator-led and 259 text-led openings; 100 posts show the product or a solving workflow, 8 name it without a full demo, and 341 keep it light or caption-level. The latest long-form review compares Gauth’s adaptive course controls against fixed YouTube and Khan Academy lessons, but its public commercial relationship remains unverified.

A second AI-tool channel tests photo solving, expert-checked explanations and the live voice tutor against answer-only AI, also without a public commercial disclosure. Public metrics contain 53 posts at 500K+ views and 35 at 1M+, with a retained maximum of 26,900,000.

This is a stratified public sample, not a census: the latest pass used a fixed two-year window, videos over ten minutes were excluded before artifacts, and persistent platform failures remain in the research ledger.